Religion News Service: In-depth. Impartial. Engaged.

Politics » Election

Paul Ryan, Joe Biden: A tale of two Catholics

(RNS) The 2012 presidential campaign could bear a new subtitle: A Tale of Two Catholics.

For the first time in U.S. history, both sides of the ballot include Roman Catholics: Democrats’ Vice President Joe Biden, and Republicans' newly named vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan.

Show Caption | Details

House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan speaking at CPAC 2011 in Washington, D.C. Credit: RNS photo by Gage Skidmore/courtesy Flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/5446900144/)

Ryan, 42, a former altar boy, belongs to a Catholic parish, St. John Vianney in Janesville, Wis. Biden, 69, the first Catholic vice president in U.S. history, attends Mass at St. Patrick’s Parish and St. Joseph on the Brandywine Church, both in Wilmington, De.

Biden and Ryan both cite their faith as a formative influence, but neither is known as a standard-bearer for the Catholic hierarchy’s chief political causes: abortion and gay marriage. In fact, the two candidates are -- politically at least -- nearly polar opposites.

Biden agrees with the church on social justice issues like poverty, but runs afoul on gay marriage and abortion rights. Ryan agrees with Catholic doctrine on abortion and gay marriage, but clashes with church leaders on social justice issues.

Show Caption |

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden meet with advisors for a health care implementation meeting in the Oval Office, March 30, 2010. Credit: RNS photo by Pete Souza / courtesy the White House via Flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/4609010870)

With Catholics comprising nearly a quarter of the U.S. electorate -- and nearly a third in Midwestern swing states -- the “Who’s the Better Catholic?” debate may become far more than an intrachurch squabble.

“It has the potential to have a huge impact on this election,” said Maria Mazzenga, a historian at Catholic University in Washington.

Neither the Democratic nor Republican party platforms perfectly align with the wide body of Catholic social doctrine, which encompasses views on everything from war to economics to the unborn. 

“The official teachings of the church can’t really be put into one camp or the other,” said Mazzenga.

So Catholic politicians must often choose between church and party orthodoxy, said R. Scott Appleby, a professor of history at the University of Notre Dame.

“In our current system, is it possible to have a politician who, along with papal teaching, says no to abortion, no to nuclear proliferation, no to poverty? The answer is no,” Appleby said.  

Biden has said that “as a Roman Catholic, I am willing to accept the teachings of my church” on abortion. But, he continued in a 2008 “Meet the Press” interview, “for me to impose that judgment on everyone else who is equally and maybe even more devout than I am seems to me is inappropriate in a pluralistic society.”

Biden, who had already been barred from speaking at Catholic schools in Wilmington because of his stance on abortion, was blasted by bishops. 

Archbishop Charles Chaput, a leading voice in the church who now heads the Archdiocese of Philadelphia, called Biden’s argument “morally exhausted.

“It’s certainly true that we need to acknowledge the views of other people and compromise whenever possible,” Chaput said at the time, “but not at the expense of a developing child’s right to life.”

Bill Donohue, president of the conservative Catholic League, said the hierarchy has made it clear that outlawing abortion and defending traditional marriage are the church's top political priorities.

“This puts Biden at a decisive disadvantage in making the case that he better represents Catholic teachings,” Donohue said.

But conservative Catholic activist Deal Hudson argues that Ryan, too, has a “Catholic problem.”

The Wisconsin congressman chairs the House Budget Committee and is credited with writing the 2012 and 2013 House Republican budget plans, which call for steep cuts to programs that care for the poor, such as food stamps and Medicaid, while giving tax breaks to the wealthy. 

For the last two years, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has written a series of letters to House lawmakers, including Ryan, arguing that the “central moral measure” of any budget is how it affects "poor and vulnerable people."

Ryan’s 2013 budget plan, which passed in the House, but has died in the Senate, “fails to meet these moral criteria,” wrote Bishop Stephen Blaire of Stockton, Calif., chairman of the bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development. 

Catholic nuns, scholars and Franciscans have been even more critical.

Show Caption | | Details

Sr. Simone Campbell talks to the press right after the nuns meeting with a representative of Rep. Paul Ryan in Janesville, WI. Credit: RNS photo by Phil Haslanger

Nuns protested Ryan’s budget on a nine-state bus tour this summer, rallying outside his district office. The Franciscan Action Network accused the congressman of “balancing the budget on the backs of the poor.” Nearly ninety scholars at Georgetown University, the nation's oldest Catholic college, said that Ryan's budget owes more to Ayn Rand, whom he has cited as a major influence, than to the Gospel. 

Ryan has vigorously defended his budget and fidelity to Catholic social teaching.

“The overarching threat to our whole society today is the exploding federal debt,” Ryan said at Georgetown University in April. “The Holy Father, Pope Benedict, has charged that governments, communities, and individuals running up high debt levels are `living at the expense of future generations’ and `living in untruth,’” he said.

Ryan has also cited the Catholic principle of “subsidiarity” to argue that government programs should not crowd out civic life, including local charities and churches.

In a Daily Beast article, Hudson suggested that Ryan has more convincing to do.

“The bottom line is this: the Romney-Ryan campaign must acknowledge the Catholic concerns about the budget as a major obstacle to winning the election,” Hudson wrote on Monday.

 

Additional Information

Topics: Politics, Election
Beliefs: Christian - Catholic
Tags: 2012 presidential election, bill donohue, cardinal charles chaput, catholic league, catholic sisters, catholic social teaching, deal hudson, gay marriage, georgetown university, joe biden, paul ryan, paul ryan budget, r. scott appleby, roman catholic church, roman catholic leaders, roman catholic nuns, roman catholicism, ryan budget, vice president joe biden, vice presidents

You must acquire rights to repost our content. Log in now for permission to download and reprint or repost this article.

Comments

  1. Isn’t it clear that religion is not the thrust of either man’s work life?  In both cases, the work life is politics, and they happen to be Catholic.  Being altar boys is only a formality.  They attend church.  But if we look carefully at all churchgoers, Catholic and others, almost all build different kinds of walls between church and state. 

    That division only appears non-existent for evangelicals who consider the bible as the main or only “textbook” they’ve ever opened.  Michelle Bachmann is a case in point, and like so many others of her kind, her Bob Jones University background aside, it is impossible to be sure if their seeming religious affiliation and fervor isn’t a disguise for political self-promotion. 

    One would need a living room familiarity with any person to obtain a genuine estimate of the influence and practice of their claimed religious beliefs in their daily lives, including their work life.  A particular church affiliation never ensures anyone’s acceptance of all that church’s tenets or practices them in their daily lives in any “faithful” way.  The study of religion is very shallow for most people and it’s practice is just as shallow.

  2. There is no equivalency in Mr. Biden supporting abortion and same-sex marriage legislation and Mr. Ryan’s budget. Opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage is a settled issue in Catholic morality because both abortion and homosexual acts are mortal sins. You can not support either of those and be a “good” Catholic. However, Mr. Ryan’s budget is not a mortal sin. Catholics must strive to protect and care for the poor. However, there are legitimate, rational disagreements about the best way to reach that ideal.  Whether Mr. Ryan’s budget reaches that ideal is an issue over which reasonably people can disagree.  You and I can both be “good” Catholics but disagree about how to best care for the poor.

  3. *Having* an abortion may be a mortal sin. Refusing to endorse laws making it illegal is not: different people will have different ideas about how to best deal with the matter in the polical realm, just as different people have different ideas about how to deal with the poor when it comes to the political realm.

    What would be far more effective in reducing abortions is this: government programs which ensure that every pregnant mother gets free medical care until her baby is born, free medical care for her child after the child is born, and that every woman has a sufficient safety net to be able to care adequately for her child even if she is a single mother and can’t find a job, as well as government-funded childcare so women can continue to go to school or work after having a child if they want to. Women have abortions when they have good reason to believe that they absolutely cannot afford a child, or that having a child will force them to give up their career and hopes for the future. Fix that, and you will prevent abortions far more effectively than some law prohibiting them.

  4. Aria, I couldn’t disagree with you more.  Refusing to pass laws that uphold the sanctity of life is a sin.  Also with the views of gay marriage Joe Biden has come out and endorsed it, so again that sound to me like someone who does not believe in the sanctity of marriage.  Again a sin.  I and others believe that laws are based off of morality first and then made to allow people to live together. 

    Now for what I believe is the most misguided part of your comment.  Your remaining argument is that the government and not the Church should aid pregnant mothers.  It appears that you are trying to replace the function of the church with government, in essence making government your God.  This is a dangerous slippery slope you are heading for and I would argue another sinful act.  Your final statements about women have abortions for “good” reasons personally makes me ill, but I will try and explain why that is misguided.  The child in the womb is a person and you argue that it is ok to murder someone for “good” reasons, you then give two reasons for murder as it will impact the parent(s) lifestyle and financial.  You argue that murder is ok if it hinders a person financially?  By using that thought then would it be ok for us to murder all the people on Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Food Stamps and Unemployment?  They are greatly effecting other peoples financial security?  This goes back the fundamental difference between the two parties.  One feels that the government should be a replacement/augmentation of their Church and the other does not.  The core problem with the first group is that once the government takes the power to become your church they will inevitably do evil.  Just look at Obamacare as an example. 

    Where some in the Catholic church are wrong is to try and make the government an augmentation of the church.  This is why Paul Ryan is right, in that controlling the out of control spending on social programs, will allow more people to CHOOSE what to do with their money and actually create more jobs and thus get more people working as opposed to leeching off of others.  More people work, the more the Church gets in donations and the more “real” good that can be done.  As opposed to the false good of giving more to the government and praying they will do the right thing.  Something they have proven they will never do in the long run.

Related Stories

Parliament bars Church of England from hosting gay weddings

CANTERBURY, England (RNS) The British government unveiled a proposal on Tuesday (Dec. 11) that excludes the Church of England and the Church in Wales from planned legislation to allow same-sex couples to marry in churches. By Trevor Grundy.
More | Comments (0)

Both sides brace for Supreme Court battle on gay marriage

WASHINGTON (RNS) The Supreme Court's long-awaited decisions to hear challenges to the federal Defense of Marriage Act and California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage move the issue to the top of the national agenda following a year in which advocates scored major legal and political victories. By Richard Wolf / USA Today.
More | Comments (0)

Polls: Americans’ views on gays and lesbians shifting fast

(RNS) In the wake of historic victories for gay rights supporters in last month's elections, a pair of USA Today/Gallup Polls find growing acceptance among Americans toward gay men and lesbians -- and soaring optimism among gay Americans that issues involving homosexuality will one day no longer divide the nation. By Susan Page/USA Today.
More | Comments (2)

Beyond Twitter: The Vatican’s other communications revolution

VATICAN CITY (RNS) After more than seven years as pope, Benedict XVI is still known as much for the public relations nightmares that have occurred on his watch as for the battle against secularism and relativism that he wants to wage. Now the pontiff has a Twitter feed and the Vatican has a plan to overhaul its antiquated communications apparatus. By David Gibson.
More | Comments (3)

Catholic bishops warn Congress not to throw poor off ‘fiscal cliff’

(RNS) As Congress embarks on high-stakes budget negotiations to avoid the “fiscal cliff,” leaders of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops are urging elected officials not to target programs for the poor and instead raise taxes and reduce defense spending. By David Gibson
More | Comments (0)

Sign In



Forgot Password?

You also can sign in with Facebook or Twitter if you've connected your account to them.

Sign In Using Facebook

Sign In Using Twitter