(RNS) Abraham Lincoln’s “Gettysburg Address” radically reinterpreted the Declaration of Independence.
The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech riffed on Lincoln’s lofty language.
And Ronald Reagan drafted King’s dream of a country where character outweighs color into an argument against affirmative action.
There are certain speeches, songs, books, letters, laws, and axioms that Americans honor enough to argue about, says religion scholar Stephen Prothero.
Like the Declaration of Independence, this almost consecrated canon inspires endless commentary about what it means to be American -- and what “America” means.
Prothero, a professor of religion at Boston University, collects these civil scriptures in his new book “The American Bible: How Our Words Unite, Divide, and Define a Nation.”
“We treat these core texts in a sacred way,” Prothero said in an interview. “Each has different meanings -- and they don’t necessarily reconcile with each other.”
So, “The American Bible” contains patriotic picks like the Pledge of Allegiance, and phrases like "city on a hill" that have been repeated by pilgrims, presidents and pundits across generations.
But some selections -- like the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision -- may be more reviled than revered by many Americans.
That’s precisely the point, Prothero says. Few documents have inspired more passionate debate than the 1973 ruling that legalized abortion -- and arguing remains the central ritual of the American republic.
Prothero says that he aimed to describe, not craft, the country's sacred scriptures. He had two main criteria: The texts had to be about America, and they had to stir controversy.
“It could have been the most brilliant thing in history, but it wouldn’t have gotten into my book unless it had a vibrant afterlife,” Prothero said.
As in his previous books, “God is Not One” and “Religious Literacy,” the prolific author urges Americans to do their homework. That is, read the primary texts for themselves and not take others’ interpretations at face value.
Prothero says his book about America’s most influential arguments was inspired by the petty partisanship of contemporary debates.
“I was casting about for what might hold us together at a time when it seems like we might be fraying apart,” he said.
The religion scholar didn’t find a central American creed. Instead he found a cacophony of voices, a loud conversation stretching from the Plymouth pilgrims to Sarah Palin.
Seeking to catalog that conversation, Prothero patterned “The American Bible” on the Christian Bible.
The “Genesis” section includes Puritan John Winthrop’s “A Model of Christian Charity,” Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense” and the Declaration of Independence.
The Constitution, and Supreme Court decisions Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade comprise the “Law” section. “Chronicles” include “Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” and Ayn Rand’s dystopian novel “Atlas Shrugged.”
George Washington’s farewell address, Thomas Jefferson’s “Letter to Danbury Baptists” and King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” comprise the “Epistles” section.
By Prothero’s own admission, “The American Bible” lacks demographic diversity.
“For better or worse, dead white men have had outsized influence over the course of American history, and among their powers has been the capacity to command an audience,” he writes in the introduction.
But “The American Bible” also gives voice to homegrown “prophets,” such as King and Malcolm X, who castigated the country for failing to live up to its ideals.
Anthea Butler, an associate professor of religious studies at the University of Pennsylvania, said “The American Bible” could have included more women, particularly suffragists like Susan B. Anthony. Feminists like Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan could also have made the cut, Butler said.
The Boston Globe, meanwhile, chided Prothero for including “less thoughtful social critics, such as Operation Rescue’s Randall Terry,” who defends the assassination of abortion doctors in a commentary on Roe v. Wade.
“The danger of false equivalency always lurks in this kind of project,” the Globe writes. “Do all sides of an argument always deserve equally respectful reading?”
Lincoln probbably loses some gravitas by being in the same book as Terry, Prothero says.
But the commentaries like Terry’s that follow after each main selection form the “heart and soul” of “The American Bible,” Prothero argues. Everyone from Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to lefty historian Howard Zinn gets space to sound off about what’s right and wrong with America.
The almost endless interpretations make “The American Bible” in some ways like a Jewish Talmud: a sacred text surrounded by impassioned argument.
“The way to wisdom here lies not in affirming simple truths but in engaging in difficult discussions,” Prothero writes. It's just those kinds of conversations, the scholar says, that his “American Bible” aims to inspire.
Religion News Godcast: Interview with Stephen Prothero
Listen below to a preview of our next Religion News Godcast, featuring an interview with Stephen Prothero. You can download the full episode beginning Wednesday, July 4, from the iTunes Store.
How much of "The American Bible" have you read?
We put together a quick survey to see how many of the works in "The American Bible" you've read. Take a look. At the end you can see the total scores.




gilhow | Jul 5, 2012 | 8:39am
You can add to “The American Bible,” like an old testament, “American Scripture” and “Ratification” by Pauline Maier, grand gatherings of evidence institution that we are a secular nation, not a religious nation at all. Many of its members might be individually, privately religious, most quasi-religious, but that is private, not publi. Both sets of writings have other things in common with biblical scripture, the lay people who claim to revere them are so pathetically and dangerously apathetic and illiterate about them.
Those are the real similarities between politics and religion in this country, between state and churches—unless you want to include the exaggerated efforts of the religious right, including people like Timothy Dolan, Catholic bishop of New York, who claim that distortions of some version of their personal moral theology is not allowed as an evasion of the law for everyone else in this country, the nation is guilty of infringing on their religious liberty.
The most astute political comment Dolan ever made was in the discussion among U.S. Catholic bishops about whether they should hire a professional media specialist because they themselves have bungled so many recent efforts to break down the wall of separation between church and state constitutionally protected by the First Amendment. Said Dolan: “In the public square, I hate to tell you, the days of fat, balding, Irish bishops are over.” Dolan should mind his own advice and stick to his altar and preaching from his own church pulpit about issues—with respect for those of different persuasions. I wonder what aphorisms Jesus pronounced about respect for others.
gilhow | Jul 5, 2012 | 8:57am
Someone should check and disclose the speech writer who dug up that nice metaphor, “City on a Shining Hill,” used by Reagan and worn out with overuse, to say nothing of inappropriateness, from the time his overdone funeral. And tell me, why are former presidents who never served in Congress “waked” in the rotunda of that building, like Ronald Reagan. Franklin Roosevelt was waked in the East Room of the White House, much more appropriate. In fact, that would be a very sufficient final tribute to any former president. To reassert our democratic nature, we should end all semblances to royalty we have been allowed to creep into our politics and government, especially since those entities have been exposed as so corrupt—just like the disassembled royalties of Europe and those that have been eliminated nation by nation, in the Middle East and Far East.
gilhow | Jul 5, 2012 | 9:03am
Ayn Rand in the same category as Samuel Clemens and Martin Luther King! Come on! Next thing we see, it will be suggested that Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor, John Boehner, and Mitch McConnell also be added. Nothing “of…, by…, and for the people” about Ayn Rand, only selfish greed. But on second thought, as we consider the present U.S. landscape, maybe Rand and Ponzi and Bernie Madoff—oh yeah, and Richard Nixon—ought to be included. “I am not a crook!” “Warts and all…”