Religion News Service: In-depth. Impartial. Engaged.

Blogs » Omid Safi - What Would Muhammad Do?

What Would Muhammad Do? has moved: Click here to read the latest posts

Why Would Afghani citizens be so angry?

In the aftermath of the deaths of two NATO soldiers in the spiraling Afghan Qur’an burning demonstrations, the US is withdrawing soldiers from Kabul ministries.  

Media personalities everywhere have reflected on the Qur’an burning disaster in Afghanistan, and we have now officially reached the absurd point where conservative pundits blame everything on Afghanis themselves.
{image_1}

As is to be expected, Rick Santorum swung away from President Obama’s apology for the United States soldiers having burned the Qur’an, by stating that President Obama's apology had "made it sound like there was something that you should apologize for, and there was no act that needed an apology."

Loooovely.
Exactly the kind of reasoned, compassionate, diplomatic qualties that one should look for in the leader of the most powerful nation on Earth.  

On the Afghani side, we have parliament members who are spinning the story the other way, and declaring Jihad against America:  “Americans are invaders, and jihad against Americans is an obligation,” said Abdul Sattar Khawasi.  

Equally Looovely.    Afghanistan is on on-going disaster, undergoing a frightening re-Talibanization, narco-violence is on the rise, and the elected officials are declaring Jihad left and right.

Why would the Afghanis be angry?  Because since 2007, there have been 11,864 documented civilian casualties in their country.    The actual number is likely to be much, much higher, given all the challenges at documenting casualties in a war-torn, difficult to navigate country like Afghanistan.

Why wold the Afghanis be angry?  Because children routinely freeze to death in their country.    The New York Times has listed a series of images from children in danger of freezing:   and also a list of children who have already frozen to death in one camp.  These children have faces, they have names, they have moms and dads, and they were all under five years old:
{image_2}

¶ Mirwais, son of Hayatullah Haideri. He was 1 ½ years old and had just started to learn how to walk, holding unsteadily to the poles of the family tent before flopping onto the frozen ridges of the muddy floor.
¶ Abdul Hadi, son of Abdul Ghani. He was not even a year old and was already trying to stand, although his father said that during those last few days he seemed more shaky than normal.
¶ Naghma and Nazia, the twin daughters of Musa Jan. They were only 3 months old and just starting to roll over.
¶ Ismail, the son of Juma Gul. “He was never warm in his entire life,” Mr. Gul said. “Not once.”

 

What’s gut-wrenching is that these preventable deaths from cold, in a country where winter is entirely predictable, is that this all comes after what the NY Times correctly describes as “after 10 years of a large international presence, comprising about 2,000 aid groups, at least $3.5 billion of humanitarian aid and $58 billion of development assistance.”

This is not an attempt to justify or explain away the wrath at the Qur’an burning incidents. 
It is, however, a plea for the need to contextualize.  
And the contextualization is that thousands of Afghani civilians are dying, and children under the age of five are freezing, in spite of billions of dollars in aid.  

You would be angry too, if this were (Heaven forbid) your own children.
The children of Afghanistan, all of our children, deserve better.  

 

 

 

 


Santorum picture from here.
The image of the Afghani child is from here. 

 

 

Tags: afghanistan, anger, apology, burning, casualties, children, civilian, freezing, jihad, koran, obama, qur'an, quran, santorum

Comments

  1. “This is not an attempt to justify or explain away the wrath at the Qur’an burning incidents.”

    LOL!!!  of course it is!!  That’s precisely what you’re doing.
    It’s demonization of American presence in Afghanastan, and completely ignoring the self inflicted death and destruction of mindless medieval people to whom the pages of a mass produced book justifies riot, destruction and murder.

    You don’t even attempt to decry it.  Don’t even express your disdain for the reaction of these nfanatical religioinists.

    Damn, if you aren’t on the FBI watch list of terrorist sympathizing / anti-American Islamics you sure should be. 

  2. I am responding to previous comment regarding Dr. Safi’s Blog. I think it is a sad day in America when people can not express their opinions and present relevant facts about a situation without threat of being or “should be” in some kind of govenment watch list. It is time for us to end simple minded approach to what happens around us, and develop a deeprer and more meaningful insights and conceptualizations about ourselves and our impact on others. I am not suggesting accepting blame for everything, but having at least an audacity to look at the “man in the mirror” and own our part. This is the foundation of a cooperative and relational living, if as a “civilized” nation that is what we are striving for. Civility has never been about a nation’s capacity to invade and destroy, but how a nation treats members of its society, and other nations. I would really like us to re-evaluate our “civility” in the light of events of the last 10 years.

  3. One of the peculiar abilities of Americans is to ignore all evidence of there own governments war crime guilt. Crimes against humanity are either ignored or denied against the plain-as-day evidence of either culpability, complicity or premeditated acts of hatred. Many conservative Americans are in the blame game, ascribing fault to Islam (or Muslims or Halaal chickens), for what is essentially WBush’s crime of enterring into illegal wars and entertaining illegal (evil and inhumane) rules of war.

    The Afghans have their problems and their own hurdles to climb, but there is no denying that America is an imperial overlord no more kinder than the British, French, Spanish or Dutch in their hey days. How else do Americans explain as much as fifty thousand dead in Libya (at NATO forces hands), 3.5million dead in Iraq (since gulf war one), at least a hundred thousand dead in Afghanistan. This gets horifficly larger, the further back in history historians travel. The tea parties of the middle east are sure to continue if this attitude continues.

Sign In



Forgot Password?

You also can sign in with Facebook or Twitter if you've connected your account to them.

Sign In Using Facebook

Sign In Using Twitter