Religion News Service: In-depth. Impartial. Engaged.

Blogs » Mark Silk - Spiritual Politics

Spiritual Politics has moved: Click here to read the latest posts

Orthodox

Eastern Orthodox church politics are by definition Byzantine, but the defenestration of Metropolitan Jonah by the synod of the Orthodox Church in America over the weekend carries with it some larger significance for American religion as well. The OCA started out as Orthodoxy for the Russians in America, but it has become home to an influx of converts--come-outers from one or another of the Western denominations who see in the tradition's hoary liturgical practices and lineal identification with the most ancient sites of Christianity what they consider an über-authentic form of the faith.

In the process--and to the consternation of many ethnic old-timers--the converts tend to believe themselves called to gird their new faith for culture war against secularism and all its ways. And Jonah was among them--a former Episcopalian drawn particularly to the Russian monastic tradition who, thanks to a financial scandal that destroyed the moral standing of the rest of the OCA hierarchy a few years ago, found himself elected to run the joint while still a baby bishop. (For the story of how Jonah went about trying to make the OCA count in the councils of the religious right, check out my sidekick Andrew Walsh's blow-by-blow in the latest issue of Religion in the News.)

Last month, Jonah appeared before the Assembly of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA), treating the breakaway denomination as an ally in "a coming realignment within Christianity"--the "split between those who hold to traditional, biblical faith as interpreted by the Fathers of the Church and the ecumenical councils; and those who espouse a secularized belief."

"As Anglicans," said Jonah, "you are no strangers to this: it is the reason you are here, and not in TEC [the Episcopal Church]." While the OCA synod does not exactly feel warm and cuddly towards the Episcopalians, this seems to have been one lone ranger escapade too many.  

Among Jonah's spear-carriers was Rod Dreher, the sometime Dallas Morning News opinion writer who joined the OCA after becoming alienated from Catholicism by the sexual abuse scandal. Now blogging over at Pat Buchanan's American Conservative, Dreher broke the Jonah story on Sunday with a bitter diatribe against the synod.

They finally got him. What they don’t understand is that they probably signed the OCA’s death warrant in so doing — not because Jonah was necessarily an exceptional metropolitan (he had his problems as an administrator, and though a very good man, was temperamentally ill-suited for the job), but because the sleazy, corrupt way the Synod has handled this from the beginning shows them to be a pack of ravening wolves.

Nor is Dreher the only Jonahite to see in the normal messy politics of removing a highly problematic religious leader the end of the line for the entire religious body. But that seems hyperbolic. More likely, it's the end of the line for their membership in the OCA. For them, it's time to come out again, and find some place more amenable to their ideological politics. Increasingly, it's looking like they won't be able to find it Eastern Orthodoxy.

GetGetReligion Update: It was a bitter fight between "the OCA’s old guard and its idealistic young leader." Lest there be any doubt where (Orthodox convert) tmatt stands.

Beliefs: Christian - Orthodox

Comments

  1. Wow Mark, so how do you really feel?

  2. What a mess that whole thing is, and to think they are fighting over a church with just 30,000 members.  There are megachurches that have larger crowds.

    Dreher has been unbearable over the whole mess, refusing to see what role he played in it.  He and the other culture war converts decided to bring their culture war battles from their old churches to the Orthodox church and Orthodox cradles just weren’t ready for their church to be turned into another culture warrior against abortion and gays.

    Where will these converts end up now, I wonder?

  3. Defenestration? Deposition, maybe. Nobody threw His Beatitude out a window that I’m aware of.

  4. These denominations are dying one by one. They are literally EATING THEMSELVES from the inside out! It will be that much easier for the governments to crush them.

  5. It was a metaphorical defenestration.

  6. I see Terry Mattingly has posted something about the story at GetReligion, encouraging reporters to rely on a horrifically slanted blog post about the Lavender Menace to get a perspective on what’s happening inside the battle.

    What he doesn’t mention—because of his conflict of interest—is the role of Rod Dreher in all of this, the battle between cradle and converts at the center of the conflict (Mattingly is a well-known convert), and his involvement in Julia Duin’s Washington Post piece on JONAH as culture warrior (the impetus for Rod Dreher starting his sockpuppet blog).

  7. What is the sound of one hen clucking…

  8. Orthodox bishops do speak on contemporary moral issues. The Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in North America, which represents all Orthodox bishops of every jurisdiction, recently reissued an old SCOBA statement opposing same sex marriage. The Assembly also issued a public statement supporting the Roman Catholic bishops in their efforts to preserve religious liberty in the face of Obamacare’s efforts to make them pay for birth control. The Orthodox Bishops of California issued a public statement supporting Proposition 8 which sought to ban same sex marriage. Our support of the right to life movement is well known.

    Fr. John W. Morris

  9. No they are not orthodoxy protection of our own thought don’t mean we are nothing.It is actually the depth of the any kind of issuses.

    painters boca raton

  10. @Fr. Morris: There is a difference, though, between issuing position statements and taking a more active role in the culture wars.  For example, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America (OU), the largest umbrella group of what is usually termed “Modern Orthodox,” issued statements opposing the legalization of same-sex marriage.  But they did it in a very nuanced way, noting their appreciation of legislative efforts to exclude faith organizations from discrimination lawsuits in this regard.  They have a viewpoint but aren’t arguing it in public.  It sounds like Jonah wants the OCA to take a more active role as a right-wing warrior.

  11. It’s clear enough to the discerning reader what the author and other detractors of Metropolitan Jonah are really saying: There is no home for social/moral conservatives in the Orthodox Church. Concern for the moral deterioration of our culture is not something that should characterize Orthodoxy. That very venerable and ancient institution should content itself to pray quietly in private icon corners, attend “beautiful liturgies,” and allow the secular powers to run the real world their own way. Now THAT’s a religion we can stomach!

  12. Well, I’m one of those converts to Orthodoxy of one year’s time now. I have to constantly ‘check myself’ when it comes to wanting to bring old baggage into my new faith. Those who become Orthodox for the wrong motives will not stay. The church will not go away, all that naysaying is just a lot of talk. Personally, I think need to remember who is the REAL head of this church, and that is our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. We as parishoners need to be focusing what should be the priority for any Orthodox Christian…theosis (union with God), and not office politics.

  13. I do not know what happened in the Orthodox Church in America. They are only one part of American Orthodoxy. It is tragic that the discussion of moral issues has been politicized. I am one who strongly believes that the Church should stay out of secular partisan politics. However, we hide behind the walls of our Churches and ignore the moral debate that rages around us. Thus, we must speak since we too are American citizens with freedom of speech. Orthodox Christians believe that marriage is between one man and one woman and that except to save the life of the mother, abortion is morally and ethically wrong. Would that we could busy ourselves with prayer and services, but sometimes we must witness what we believe is true to society. Now is such a time.

    Fr. John W. Morris

  14. No wonder religion is on the way down. The choice is between Evangelicals, Orthodox and an increasingly conservative Roman Catholic Church fighting Culture Wars, and mainline Protestant denominations whose clergy for the most part don’t even believe in God, and regard their mission as fighting Culture Wars on the other side.

    Good God, isn’t anyone doing religion any more? Isn’t there any place I can do religion without signing onto an ethical agenda I can’t in conscience support?

  15. I converted about 16 years ago. I am currently attending an OCA parish. I don’t think I knew anything about Metropolitan Jonah other than he was the Metropolitan until very recently. When I mention Rod Dheher at church no one ever seems to know who he is. I wouldn’t overestimate the importance of all of this.

  16. Why this focus totally and solely on sexuality?  I won’t generalize about motives: each person who is consumed with sexuality is in that sad and neuritic mental state because of his or her own personal psychological pathology.

    However, I will say that those like Drieher who are concerned only about sexual politics are not Orthodox Christians.  Indeed, they are not Christian at all.

    READ THE GOSPELS.  Over and over again Jesus condemns in the most forceful and hostile terms possible the wealthy 1% of his day and their exploitation of the poor 99% of his fellow Jews at that time.  No where, not once, does he say anything about homosexuality.  Go ahead and look for any condemnation of gays in the Gospels.  You won’t find any.  Indeed, Jesus only very rarely talks about heterosexuality either.  Jesus simply does not think sexual “sins” are important compared to the sins of the Rich and the most serious sin of all—being rich at all when others are poor and hungry.

    Note the story about the Samaritan women at the well, or the story of the woman whom he saves from being stoned for adultery.  Jesus very gently chides both women, but it is clear that he does not think their “sins” are serious.  Then compare that to his harsh condemnation of the rich, over and over again.

    Yes Christians must discuss politics with each other at their Sunday services.  And they then must express their conviction to the world.  And it is clear that in 2012 any one that believez in the Christian God will spend all his or her time and money working to deafest the Republican and tea baggers.

    For example, Republican like Drieher want to end what they call “Aboma care” because they simply have zero concern for anyone but themselves.  It matters nothing to them hundreds of thousands of poor folk die each year in horrible pain.  Republicans are like the Priest and the Levite in the Parable of the Good Samaritan.  They just walk on by the poor and suffering human beings they see around them.  Instead they spend all their time and money seeing to stop harmless practices such as “gay marriage”!!!!  They ignore what Jesus tells us is important , and they focus on what Jesus tells us is trivial.

  17. Ho-hum. Paffhausen was never much of a bishop in the first instance. The OCA’s been run by an archpriestly coterie since Feodosy Lazor. Secondly, the OCA is Old News. What’s up (and important) is the upcoming conference in London of the MP and ROCOR bishops… the buzz has it that organisational revamping is in the works. That will impact the OCA situation in a serious way. Thirdly, all of the above commenter seem innocent of any knowledge of contemporary thought in the Russian Church. Dreher and Paffhausen? Please, give me a break… why not Fr Vsevolod Chaplin and Patriarch Kirill? Their ideas, at least, are coherent, Orthodox, and… friendly to the LEFT, not the culture warriors.

    Only an ignorant person could try to “square the circle” and ally Orthodoxy with rightwing currents. Read Patriarch Kirill… it’s all on patriarchia.ru, Interfax, VOR, Pravoslavie (the Russian side). Go to the source. Why rely on American newbies?

  18. I read the Gang of Bishops’ July 16th missive, and it provided no satisfactory explanation, in my opinion.  In fact the letter seemed more like a cable TV pitch outline submitted to Discovery ID. Sexual allegations, and a cover-up by Metropolitan Jonah are the sort of charges tossed around by the Feds after they’d already decided to kill the Branch Davidians. Vladimir Putin has been accused of child molestation in a pathetic effort by the MSM to gin up 2 Minutes’ Hate.  But what’s in it for SCOBA? Just asking.

Sign In



Forgot Password?

You also can sign in with Facebook or Twitter if you've connected your account to them.

Sign In Using Facebook

Sign In Using Twitter