Religion News Service: In-depth. Impartial. Engaged.

Blogs » Jana Riess - Flunking Sainthood

Flunking Sainthood has moved: Click here to read the latest posts

The Top Six Mistakes Reporters Make About Mormons

{image_1} As I noted on Friday, I spent the weekend in New York at a conference I co-organized on Mormonism and American politics. We had two days of stimulating papers and presentations, an overview of which you can read here. One of my favorite talks was by veteran religion reporter Peggy Fletcher Stack, who has been covering Mormonism (and every other faith) for years for the Salt Lake Tribune and had some advice for journalists who suddenly find themselves trying to understand Mormonism this year during the Romney campaign.

Peggy’s basic thesis was that many reporters cover Mormonism using a basic paradigm taken from covering Protestantism, and fail to appreciate important differences. With Peggy’s permission, here are the top six mistakes journalists make:

  1. Misunderstanding or misusing unique Mormon vocabulary. Latter-day Saints have their own lexicon that can take some getting used to. Sunday sermons are called “talks.” An astonishing number of people are called “president,” making it difficult for outside reporters. Is a branch president higher or lower than a stake president? What about a district president? A mission president? An elders’ quorum president? A deacons’ quorum president? There ought to be a flow chart.
  2. Misusing common vocabulary words that mean something different to Mormons than they do to Protestants. In addition to their own language mentioned above, Mormons’ adopted religious words don’t necessarily correspond to their Protestant counterparts. An LDS seminary is not the same as studying for the ministry. An “elder” can be 19 years old; a 15-year-old boy can be a priest; and a missionary serves for a limited time. Missionary service is not a career.
  3. Misunderstanding the relationship between LDS local leaders and the general hierarchy in Salt Lake City. Local leaders are always in flux, a fact that is hard for reporters to understand. Reporters this year have made a big deal of Romney being a “high priest” in the LDS Church, not realizing that a high priest is anyone who has ever served in a bishopric, which is tens of thousands of people. (And, I would add, any priesthood holder who gets old. After a while they get advanced to the title whether they’ve served as a local leader or not.)
  4. Presuming that an LDS bishop has the same power or role as a Protestant minister. A Mormon bishop is essentially an administrator who does not give sermons. He holds a full-time job elsewhere (butcher, baker, candlestick maker, venture capitalist) and is not paid for being a bishop. He usually only serves for a few years, not for life. Then someone else is appointed from within the congregation.
  5. Mistaking folk doctrines for core beliefs. “This is especially obvious in those journalists who use the Book of Mormon musical as a primary source,” Peggy said. Even Maureen Dowd of the New York Times has claimed twice that Mormons don’t drink caffeine (which she subsequently corrected at Peggy’s request). Granted, it can be difficult to ferret out what are actual core doctrines and what are just individual members’ interpretations, but it’s important to try.
  6. Treating all former Mormons as whistleblowers who promise to reveal untold truths. Former Mormons do have important personal stories to tell, but these are rarely balanced by the equally important personal stories that believing Latter-day Saints have to tell. And merely having a personal story, whether pro or con, does not instantly make any source an expert on a religion. Peggy expressed concern that “the New York Times and CNN seem to have given a platform to every former Mormon with a book.”

Peggy also noted that most mainline Protestants align with congregations that fit their political and social views, so journalists automatically assume that Mormons can do the same thing. It’s hard for them to understand Mormons who stay within the faith and meet the change from within.

Topics: Politics, Government & Politics
Beliefs: Mormon
Tags: jana riess, journalists who cover mormonism, misconceptions about mormons, mitt romney mormon, mormon bishop, mormon doctrine, mormon folk doctrine, mormon stake president, mormonism and american politics, mormonism and american politics conference at columbia university 2012, mormonism in the media, peggy fletcher stack, salt lake tribune

Comments

  1. The last observation, the assumption that Mormons could choose a more politically congenial congregation that is still Mormon, is surely one of the assumptions behind the accusation against Mitt Romney taht, back before blacks could be ordained to the priesthood, he should have walked out and found another place to worship, the way a Southern Baptist in 1978 could (try to) find a congregation that was racially integrated (as Jimmy Carter did).  They don’t understand that, if you believe the Church is essentially what it claims to be, you take it with its apparent flaws as well. 

    My guess is that most reporters would be surprised to learn that there were black Mormons before 1978, and that those members struggled with the priesthood ban but many of them persevered despite it.  My guess is that the reporters also assume that Mormons were into the whole Jim Crow thing, when the reality is that there were no segregated Mormon congregations, no segregated schools, and no significant part of the Utah economy ever depended on slavery.  They have no clue that the original Mormons came from New England, Ohio, Canada, Britain and Europe.  If they absorbed racism, it was from other Americans.

Sign In



Forgot Password?

You also can sign in with Facebook or Twitter if you've connected your account to them.

Sign In Using Facebook

Sign In Using Twitter