Religion News Service: In-depth. Impartial. Engaged.

Blogs » Jana Riess - Flunking Sainthood

Flunking Sainthood has moved: Click here to read the latest posts

Anti-Mormon (and Mormon) Trolls

In the weeks leading up to the 2012 election, a flurry of media articles explored Mormonism and its role in American life. Many of these were very well done (including this CNN piece on what the White House might look like if Mitt Romney were president); it’s become clear to me that most journalists are committed to understanding more about the Mormon faith and its people.

I would say that the quality of journalistic coverage of Mormonism has improved over the course of the year, with highlights from NBC, the New York Times, and many others. This is very good news—not just for Mormons, but for all minority faiths.

However, I’m not so sanguine about the American people who comment on these articles. For example, I tried to read the first comments on the CNN article, but gave up after the first few dozen because they were so dang predictable. Here are some samples (out of order) of the more than 2,000 comments that article elicited:

Side 1: “As a Christian who worked for and with many Mormons during my career as an engineer, I can only say that if Romney wins, GOD HELP US. As a group, the Mormons are self-centered and focused only on spreading their brand of religion to others. Romney would be unable to ignore the years of cult-like brain-washing he has been exposed to by his elders; he would act instinctively in times of crisis to protect fellow Mormons, and turn his back on the rest of us non-Mormons. Again, GOD HELP US if Romney's elected; life as we know it will cease to exist in America, and we'll all be to blame in that event.”

Side 2: "The Book of Mormon says liars go to HELL.”

Side 1: “Where does it say adults who still believe in fairy tales go?”

Side 2: “I cannot believe the comments on this article. Yes Mormons ARE Christian. That is so ridiculous. We believe in Christ. We have faith in him which compels us to follow what he taught. Christ is my Redeemer and Creator. I believe there is good in all religions and it is wonderful that we can all meet together to learn and strengthen each other in our faith. Kathy, on every LDS meetinghouse it says, "visitors welcome". I have invited many people to our services. They are not secret. If you are so curious go sit in on a service. For all of those who hate mormons so much I bet you know and respect a few (there are over 14 million of us and counting). Show a little tolerance, love, and respect for God's children (as Jesus taught).

Side 1: “Well here is another one for everyone... Acccording to the prophecies of Mormanism, when a Morman is elected President of the United States, the government will fall... shortly after, the 100.000 faithful will set out and kill all non-believers. In other words, if you don't belong to the church, you will be executed. This, ladies and gentlemen, comes from the doctrine directly from the church itself. Pretty amazing ‘cult’ mentality, no?”

Side 2: “Yeah, sure. I'll be hanging on every word of some bozo who can't even spell ‘Mormon’ correctly. I'm sure you know ALL about it.”

And they’re off, both sides abandoning reason and civility in their mutual passion for demonstrating that their opponents are imbeciles. Occasionally someone will attempt to provide a voice of balance and reason into the conversation:

Ben: “It seems obvious to me, just from these comments, why this article was written. The amount of ignorance about Mormons and their faith in this country is staggering. While this article does come off a bit patronizing, its still worth mentioning some of the unique scenarios a Mormon president would present.

As a general rule, the Mormons I know have been good and happy people. Of course, I've also known Mormons who had failing marriages and kids straying into substance abuse. In that respect, Mormons are no different from any other people of faith. As to the missionary side of the faith, I find it deeply hypocritical of Christians to find fault with others pushing their religion. As an athiest, I find myself accosted by pushy Christians far more often than Mormons. Perhaps evangelicals ought to find out what that word means before accusing others of pushy evangelism.”

And then someone else will criticize the third party who is seeking balance:

CP: “Ben – If you are a fellow atheist, at least learn how to spell it.”

I look for the day when news stories and articles about some aspect of Mormon life are followed by an insightful discussion of the actual material presented, rather than what it always devolves into: another fruitless debate between anti-Mormon critics on the one hand and LDS apologists on the other, all weighing the merits and demerits not of the specific article itself but of the truth claims of the entire Mormon religion.

I’m not holding my breath, though.

The troll warning sign is used with permission of

Topics: Faith, Doctrine & Practice, Politics, Election
Beliefs: Christian, Christian - Catholic, Christian - Orthodox, Christian - Protestant, Evangelical, Freethought (Atheist, Humanist, Agnostic), Mormon
Tags: anti-mormonism, cnn on mormonism, comment trolls, flunking sainthood, jana riess, mitt romney mormonism, mormons news coverage 2012 election


  1. I think that trolls, and their ability to poison public discourse, are a huge problem that we writers and journalists need to deal with if we are serious about promoting such discourse. I’m not sure how, although I think part of it requires being more ruthless with deleting disrespectful comments and/or coming up with new formats and rules for comment boards in particular. We know that people are much less likely to be rude and combative when they talk to people face to face, and I believe this is true also for direct person-to-person conversation on the Internet. For example, after getting almost 600 comments on a post about why I am a Christian who usually votes Democrat, I closed the comments simply because managing them was becoming a full-time job. I did, however, make my email address available and invited people to respond that way if they felt they had something to say. In the 600 public comments, I would guess that at least half were combative, rude, missing the point, etc. After I closed comments and invited people to email me directly, I received a whole bunch of emails thanking me for the post, and a total of three expressing disagreement. Two of those three were very respectful, while the third was a little obnoxious but not offensive. My take-away: When people can speak out into the ether, they let their less savory sides go to town. When they are forced to talk directly TO someone, they feel an obligation to do so with some respect and kindness, even if they disagree. Is there a way to use this lesson to eliminate trollish behavior? I don’t know, but I think we need to try.

  2. Here’s an idea: get rid of the comments section.

  3. having spent many years in the/Worldwide Church of God (and actually I can “blame” a Mormon for that—I had a big crush on Donny Osmond, read a tiny bit of the BoM and then started reading Plain Truth and related stuff my mother had) I can accept Mormons as Christians, though I only know a few, but then again, I have trouble with religions that are so strict. PTSD from WCG.  So… I remember, vaguely, reading Jana"s article on Mother’s day and thinking we didn’t have it as bad. But maybe that was just in Boston. My friend in Providence was often (verb)ed for her desire to have no kids, by the brethren there.
    So I can sorta see both sides (and I can’t proselytize). I just know, for me, going to any church like that would be going backwards.
    I also know the vitriol doesn’t help anyone. Our ancestors may not have come here to have freedom for all, but at least Roger Williams did (which makes my friend’s experience more ironic, but now she’s in Maine and I’m in FL and WCG is very different but neither of us are in it).

    Live and let live and if someone pisses you off, take it to them—don’t lay it on a whole group.

    I should read the articles…

  4. When commenters descend into defamation, like the accusation that Mormons are going to murder innocent Americans, they should be deleted, not just the offending comment, but their whole chain.  I don’t think anyone would tolerate such an accusation made against Jews, or even Muslims, so why it is tolerated when the accusation is made against Mormons is irrational. 

    There should also be promotion of a pledge by journalists that they will ask for the views of a member in good standing of a minority religious group as a check on the accuracy of the description of the group and its beliefs.  People are relying on the stuff people like you write to form their opinions, and you owe it to them to be accurate about the basic facts you relate.  There are, for instance, dozens of Mormon blogs in the “Bloggernacle” where bloggers would be happy to serve in a rotating capacity as unpaid consultants on such articles on an informal, uncredited and confidential basis.  The people who write such blogs, such as and, are often educated and articulate professionals who understand a lot about the ways in which their Mormon beliefs differ from those of other Christians, as well as ways they are similar.  They are not in the employ of the LDS Church and are often willing to acknowlefge the imperfection of Mormons as leaders, including themselves.  Indeed, there are Mormons like that in every major metropolitan area, so every newspaper, magazine, TV, radio, and internet news organization could find someone who is local to help them identify bloopers about Mormonism and Mormons in any story.

Sign In

Forgot Password?

You also can sign in with Facebook or Twitter if you've connected your account to them.

Sign In Using Facebook

Sign In Using Twitter